- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 22:26:16 +0100
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@googlemail.com>
- Cc: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, public-lod@w3.org, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com>, John Sheridan <John.Sheridan@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk>, ivan@w3.org
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Jeni, > > [Rest of post snipped for now, I'll respond properly later. Seems like we > are on sufficiently similar wavelengths that it is "just" a matter of > working the details.] > >> I don't know where the best place is to work on this: I guess at some >> point it would be good to set up a Wiki page or something that we could use >> as a hub for discussion? > > I'd suggest setting up a Google Code area and making anyone who is > interested a committer. That gives us a Wiki but also hosting for associated > code for generating/navigating the format. I'd be happy to set one up. > > An alternative is the ESW Wiki but (a) that doesn't have an associated code > area, (b) I don't personally have access right now (though I believe that is > easily fixable) and (c) it might be presumptuous to associate it with W3C at > this stage of baking. Ivan Herman (cc:'d) has been looking into a modernised general 'Semantic Web' wiki area on w3.org, ie. using (Semantic?) MediaWiki, rather than the old MoinMoin (for now and forseeable ESW will remain using MoinMoin, since migration is non-trivial). There was also some recent discussion at W3C about opening up Git or Mercurial distributed versioning systems for the standards community, which sounds like it could be a good fit for SemWeb IG-and-nearby collaborations. However that is at an early stage. Google Code might be easiest for now... Ivan - care to comment? Dan
Received on Sunday, 13 December 2009 21:26:58 UTC