- From: Patrick van Kleef <pkleef@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:42:09 +0100
- To: Andreas Schultz <a.schultz@fu-berlin.de>
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
Hi Andreas, > we released a new Benchmark experiment with the BSBM recently. > > Results can be found under > > http://www4.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/bizer/BerlinSPARQLBenchmark/results/V5/ > > This time we present a pure triple store Benchmark. Instead of the smaller > datasets of the previous experiment we generated a 200 millions triples > datasets. So there are only 100M and 200M triples datasets this time. > > The main reasons for the experiment was on the one hand a bug fix in ARQ > that was leading to a significant speed up of Jena TDBs query performance. > On the other hand BigOWLIM was tested for the first time. > To make these results better comparable we also added the fastest store of > our previous experiment to the candidates, which has been Virtuoso > Open-Source. First of all i would have liked to be advised on this new run before the published results, specially when you put my name on the bottom of this document. That would have given me the opportunity to suggest you use the later VOS 5.0.12 release (dated 28-10-2009) instead of the VOS 5.0.11 release (dated 23-04-2009) you used to compare with. Or even against our new VOS 6.0.0 release (dated 16-10-2009). Like other participating projects of the last full benchmark, we have not exactly sat still for the last half year in terms of both bugfixes and enhancements/optimizations. It would have also given me a chance to inform you that the settings and methods you currently use for testing Virtuoso may not be appropriate for loading the larger sizes of 100M and 200M you are now using for your benchmark. I will find some time to redo the benchmark here and send the results to you for comparison. Secondly, i was under the impression that only published open source projects would be considered in this benchmark, however according to the web page for BigOWLIM <http://www.ontotext.com/owlim/index.html> : "BigOWLIM is available under an RDBMS-like commercial licence on a per-server-CPU basis; it is neither free nor open-source" Does this mean that for the next Berlin Benchmark release you are considering other commercial contributions as well? Respectfully, Patrick van Kleef --- Maintainer Virtuoso Open Source Edition OpenLink Software
Received on Thursday, 10 December 2009 14:37:43 UTC