- From: Mark Baker <mark@coactus.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 13:05:26 -0500
- To: nathan@webr3.org
- Cc: pedantic-web@googlegroups.com, "kidehen@openlinksw.com" <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > actually.. how about this.. Expressing the links in HTML is fine too. > GET /user/23 HTTP/1.1 > Host: example.org > Accept: application/rdf+xml > > --> > > HTTP/1.1 200 Ok > Content-Type: application/rdf+xml > Link: <http://example.org/user/23>; rel="alternate"; type="text/rdf+n3" > Link: <http://example.org/user/23>; rel="alternate"; > type="application/rdf+json" > > and so forth.. note the URI never changes only the type.. You really need the specific URIs otherwise it defeats the point of Link header and your use of file extension convention remains hidden from the world. Mark.
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 18:06:00 UTC