- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:47:25 +0000
- To: Tom Heath <tom.heath@talis.com>
- Cc: Georgi Kobilarov <georgi.kobilarov@gmx.de>, public-lod@w3.org
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 11:05 +0000, Tom Heath wrote: > IIRC then Tim disagreed with this at some point, arguing that two > documents that describe the same resource and are reached by content > negotiation and a 303 from the same URI should contain the same > information to the greatest possible extent. Even where we discount > aspects like navigation and ads in HTML documents I don't agree with > this; HTML and RDF documents have different audiences and therefore > the requirements on them are different. I agree that two representations of a resource should provide substantially the same data (within the limits of the media types of each resource), but if you're offering two separate resources at separate URIs, then I don't see why they need contain similar data. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Tuesday, 8 December 2009 16:48:12 UTC