- From: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:12:20 +0200
- CC: public-lod@w3.org
Toby Inkster wrote: > <#me> gr:seeks [ gr:includesObject [ gr:typeOfGood <#product> ] ] . > > Really I'd just want something like: > > <#me> ex:seeks <#product> . > > Yes, that's not quite as expressive - I can't say how much I'd be > willing to pay for it, or how many I want, or in what timeframe I want > to buy it, but it's enough for a simple wishlist. ex:seeks could of > course be defined in terms of gr:seeks, so that mapping could be done in > both directions, but I do think that a simpler term is needed. > > Then a wishlist becomes as easy as: > > <> a sioctypes:WishList ; > foaf:maker <#me> . > <#me> ex:seeks <#product1> , <#product2> , <#product3> . > > Ian's barter vocab is closer to this, though I think it could be > improved by specifying domains and ranges for the terms and generally > defining them a little less loosely. How about: barter:wants owl:propertyChainAxiom (gr:seeks gr:includesObject gr:typeOfGood) . Regards, Simon
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 16:12:59 UTC