- From: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:11:36 +1000
- To: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
2009/8/12 Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>: > Are you saying that the only way to access Linked Data is via SPARQL? That is going a bit far, but in the end if you want to allow people to extend the model it has to be done using SPARQL. If the extension is taken well by users then it could be included in what is resolved for the URI but that doesn't mean it is not Linked Data up until the point it is included. I for one loved the recent addition of the Page Links set in a separate Named Graph, and I don't see how this is different. Cheers, Peter
Received on Wednesday, 12 August 2009 00:12:23 UTC