W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2008

Re: Can we afford to offer SPARQL endpoints when we are successful? (Was "linked data hosted somewhere")

From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:29:14 +0100
Message-ID: <1f2ed5cd0811290929n3eff3cefo8f47b9cea4f04b23@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Juan Sequeda" <juanfederico@gmail.com>
Cc: "Peter Ansell" <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, "Richard Cyganiak" <richard@cyganiak.de>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>

<%=profanity /%>
or something - cool thread

while I disagree with many of Aldo's individual points, getting them
surfaced is really positive

in response to a line from the firestarter:

"The only reason anyone can afford to offer a SPARQL endpoint is because it
doesn't get used too much?"

while my love of SPARQL is enormous, I can't see the SPARQL endpoint
being a lasting scenario.
linking and the fresh approach to caching this will demand, need
another rev. before the web starts doing data efficiently

the answer to the quoted line is the question - how can you not
afford? Classic stuff re. amazon opening up their silo a little bit -
guess what, profit!

pip,
Danny.


2008/11/28 Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> 2008/11/27 Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
>>>
>>> Hugh,
>>>
>>> Here's what I think we will see in the area of RDF publishing in a few
>>> years:
>>>
>>> - those query capabilities are described in RDF and hence can be invoked
>>> by tools such as SQUIN/SemWebClient to answer certain queries efficiently
>>
>> I still don't understand what SQUIN etc have that goes above
>> Jena/Sesame/SemWeb etc which can do this URI resolution with very little
>> programming knowledge in custom applications.
>
> True, jena/sesame does everything that SQUIN entails to do. However, SQUIN
> is oriented to the "web2.0" developers. How is a php/ror web developer going
> to interact with the web of data and make some kind of semantic-linked data
> mashup over a night? SQUIN will let them do this. No need of having jena,
> learning jena, etc. Make it simple! If it is not simple, then developers are
> not going to use it.
>
>
>
>



-- 
http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Saturday, 29 November 2008 17:29:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:20:43 UTC