- From: Christopher Stewart <christopher.stewart@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:26:18 -0500
- To: "Aldo Bucchi" <aldo.bucchi@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Kingsley Idehen" <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, music-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com, public-lod@w3.org
- Message-ID: <fa34816a0811210426u4f869428geebd6e3367b15edd@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the Bucchi-ing... :-P Have fun, Chris On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Aldo Bucchi <aldo.bucchi@gmail.com> wrote: > Christopher, > > > LinkingOpenData-ed > > LOL. > > Why not just create the verb... let's get it "LOD'ed" or "loded". > > Let's get this database "loded". > Or, let's LOD this database. ( Link as Open Data ). > > Neither "lod" nor "loded" are english words. > > Or, you can also try the shorter version: > > Could you Open and Link your Data Sources using Open Source OpenLink > Data Spaces so it adds to the Linked Open Data Cloud? > > ...Please? > > Best, > A > > PS: OpenLink Data Spaces is built atop Virtuoso, which can actually be > used for this. The word didn't fit ;) > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:27 AM, Christopher Stewart > <christopher.stewart@gmail.com> wrote: > > Ho, > > > > Quoting M. Mulligan : > > > > "We have an API in the works to be completed in Q1 2009. We are also > > bringing on a VP Tech around the same time, so would you mind touching > back > > then and we can talk more about this? It's a little over my head, > although > > I get and support the general idea." > > > > Thus an opening and a date for 2009 we have. > > > > Have fun, > > Chris > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Christopher Stewart > > <christopher.stewart@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hey, > >> > >>> Do they have an API ? > >>> > >>> Do they have Feeds that expose public versions of their aggregated > data? > >>> > >>> The above are the critical pieces re. RDF-ization. > >> > >> I agree that those are critical pieces, yet I can see neither thus > far... > >> > >> I have directed their co-founder and president (Brenden Mulligan) > towards > >> some of the LOD sites. I'll discuss further with him and when/if there's > >> interest I'll reporting here, or invite him to join the thread... > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Kingsley Idehen < > kidehen@openlinksw.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Christopher Stewart wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Howdy, > >>>> > >>>> I think they could become a significant nexus for artist-related data, > >>>> and an important agent for the democratization of the semantic > technologies. > >>>> > >>>> A huge amount of artists rely on social networks and music sites for > >>>> promotion and distribution. > >>>> > >>>> Entering contents on such sites is a painfully tedious process (i.e. > >>>> large number of services / no standards / so very few importers), and > given > >>>> the trends it looks as if it's only gonna get worse, until something > is > >>>> done. In other words, having the possibility to "post once, publish > >>>> everywhere" is godsend. > >>>> > >>>> Thus the publishing service that ArtistData is offering has the > >>>> potential to interest a huge amount of artists, and become a vital > part of > >>>> their organizations. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> For now ArtistData only handle shows, but they have plans to add > "blogs, > >>>> news, and more in the upcoming months" (hopefully, "more" means music > >>>> metadata, photos, videos, contacts, ...). > >>>> > >>>> So, assuming that they're successful, then they will become a kind of > >>>> funnel in which artists pour their contents, and via which music and > social > >>>> sites get fed. And once the funnel is made then it's easy to make it > >>>> available to the general public also. Thus a lot of data will go > through > >>>> their hands before reaching their partner sites, and they'll have the > weight > >>>> of a huge amount of users behind them, so they'll be in a very good > position > >>>> to propose standards (they most probably will have to at some point or > >>>> another if they want to keep their hair), and generally influence how > music > >>>> and social sites handle and represent data on their side. > >>>> > >>>> So, to restate my original message in less inspired language, it would > >>>> surely be interesting to have ArtistData adopt RDF and the semantic > >>>> technologies. > >>>> > >>>> Thus being said, ladies and gents, have a nice day (and might I add a > >>>> belated happy birthday to K). > >>>> > >>>> Take care, > >>>> Chris > >>>> __________________________________________________ > >>>> > >>>> Rock : http://myspace.com/poligraf > >>>> Micro-Funding : http://poligraf.wordpress.com/ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 4:29 AM, Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com > >>>> <mailto:yves.raimond@gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Hello! > >>>> > >>>> > Would be interesting to have the following MusicOntologized and > >>>> > LinkingOpenData-ed : > >>>> > > >>>> > https://www.artistdata.com/us/howitworks > >>>> > >>>> Looks nice - a bit like ping.fm <http://ping.fm>, but for > >>>> music-related data :-) > >>>> However, I am not sure what there is to RDFize and interlink there, > >>>> as > >>>> the data is posted to multiple sites (e.g. eventful, last.fm > >>>> <http://last.fm> etc.) but > >>>> not available directly or stored on artistdata.com > >>>> <http://artistdata.com>? > >>>> > >>>> I am guessing writing a more complete linked data wrapper to the > >>>> last.fm <http://last.fm> api than the one at > >>>> http://dbtune.org/last-fm/ could allow us > >>>> to interlink data posted through artistdata.com > >>>> <http://artistdata.com>? > >>>> > >>>> Cheers! > >>>> y > >>>> > >>>> > > >>>> > Have fun ! > >>>> > Chris > >>>> > > >>>> > __________________________________________________ > >>>> > Christopher Stewart > >>>> > > >>>> > Rock : http://myspace.com/poligraf > >>>> > Micro-Funding : http://poligraf.wordpress.com/ > >>>> > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ > >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >>>> Groups "Music Ontology Specification Group" group. > >>>> To post to this group, send email to > >>>> music-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com > >>>> <mailto:music-ontology-specification-group@googlegroups.com> > >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>>> music-ontology-specification-group+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<music-ontology-specification-group%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com> > >>>> > >>>> <mailto: > music-ontology-specification-group%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com<music-ontology-specification-group%252Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com> > > > >>>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>> > >>>> > http://groups.google.com/group/music-ontology-specification-group?hl=en > >>>> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > >>>> > >>>> > >>> Chris, > >>> > >>> Do they have an API ? > >>> > >>> Do they have Feeds that expose public versions of their aggregated > data? > >>> > >>> The above are the critical pieces re. RDF-ization. > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen<http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/%7Ekidehen> > >>> President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > Aldo Bucchi > U N I V R Z > Office: +56 2 795 4532 > Mobile:+56 9 7623 8653 > skype:aldo.bucchi > http://www.univrz.com/ > http://aldobucchi.com > > PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION > This message is only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is > addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. > If > you are not the intended recipient, please do not distribute or copy this > communication, by e-mail or otherwise. Instead, please notify us > immediately by > return e-mail. > INFORMACIÓN PRIVILEGIADA Y CONFIDENCIAL > Este mensaje está destinado sólo a la persona u organización al cual está > dirigido y podría contener información privilegiada y confidencial. Si > usted no > es el destinatario, por favor no distribuya ni copie esta comunicación, por > email o por otra vía. Por el contrario, por favor notifíquenos > inmediatamente > vía e-mail. >
Received on Friday, 21 November 2008 12:27:06 UTC