- From: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:27:16 +0000
- To: "Giovanni Tummarello" <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>
- Cc: "Jim Hendler" <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>, public-lod@w3.org
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Giovanni Tummarello > <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org> wrote: >>> >>> dbtune.org provides at least 14 billion triples (see >>> http://blog.dbtune.org/post/2008/04/02/DBTune-is-providing-131-billion-triples >>> + the Musicbrainz D2R server at http://dbtune.org/musicbrainz/, so I >>> guess you'd need a pretty big phone to aggregate all that :-) >> >> .. thus the problem with wrappers should they be counted in ? >> > > Indeed. But after all, even a database exposed via Virtuoso or D2R can > actually be considered as a wrapper. It's easy enough to estimate the > number of triples a wrapper provides, by analysing the source data, so > why not counting them? > >>> outdated... For example, at http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes, we >>> publish at least 10 billion triples. I guess the number of triples at >>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/beta must be quite large as well. >> >> that's like 15 times wikipedia,? how's that composed? >> > Arg, sorry, I mistyped - that's 10 *million*, not 10 billions (and I consistently mistyped on twitter as well, sorry about that). But dbtune is really around 15 *billion* (including wrappers). Sorry for the confusion! y > http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/ > > Lots of information about all BBC programmes: brands, series, > episodes, versions, broadcasts, etc... > > Cheers! > y > >> Giovanni >> >
Received on Thursday, 20 November 2008 15:27:51 UTC