- From: John Goodwin <John.Goodwin@ordnancesurvey.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 08:37:03 -0000
- To: "Ian Davis" <me@iandavis.com>, "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: "Chris Bizer" <chris@bizer.de>, <public-lod@w3.org>, "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>, <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>, <dbpedia-announcements@lists.sourceforge.net>
Ian Davies wrote: > Again, isn't validity checking something that can only be done with OWL. RDFS only adds for > information. I think strictly speaking both OWL and RDFS only add information, but with OWL you can at least check that the information is logically consistent and use to validation in some sense. I think to use domain and range to get validation you really need OWL disjoints as well. I guess in theory you could check the inferred types for instances based on the range/domain restriction but that could be pretty tedious for a large abox!? John . This email is only intended for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email which must not be copied, distributed or disclosed to any other person. Unless stated otherwise, the contents of this email are personal to the writer and do not represent the official view of Ordnance Survey. Nor can any contract be formed on Ordnance Survey's behalf via email. We reserve the right to monitor emails and attachments without prior notice. Thank you for your cooperation. Ordnance Survey Romsey Road Southampton SO16 4GU Tel: 08456 050505 http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 08:42:12 UTC