- From: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 00:55:13 +0100
- To: "Hugh Glaser" <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
A validator in sindice is possible and has been discussed but the list of things to do is now quite scary :-) poor man validator: plese post us about yout sitemap here http://forum.sindice.com/index.php . Free report and quick indexing to those who do. Giovanni > Mind you, Giovanni says that a lot of sitemaps are broken, so they fix them > and cache the fixed ones for Sindice purposes :-) > > > On 30/05/2008 00:02, "Peter Ansell" <ansell.peter@gmail.com> wrote: > > ... >>> >>> Richard >>> >>> [1] http://sw.deri.org/2007/07/sitemapextension/ >> >> That looks very usable to me. Has anyone used it for linked data? How >> do you discover these sitemaps as a linked data user, as opposed to >> sitemaps which are traditionally submitted to search engines for >> searching. In either case, it would be nice to have an RDF description >> submitted as part of a sitemap to a semantic search engine so it might >> be good to standardise that mechanism based around these ideas. >> >> Also, there is a reference in that document to N-Quad format, what is >> that exactly? [2] is a bit sparse on examples so it is hard to >> understand what is meant by the syntax. >> >> Also, is the slicing declaration attempting to make up for a deficit >> in the SPARQL protocol w.r.t. DESCRIBE? Why not utilise SELECT if you >> had an idea of what pieces of information you desire, although I guess >> the server is in the best position to recommend information to you >> with DESCRIBE queries. I think slicing mechanisms should be defined >> outside of that context, although the lack of progress with CBD [3] is >> a little worrying with respect to that bit. >> >> [2] http://sw.deri.org/2008/02/nx/ >> [3] http://www.w3.org/Submission/CBD/ >> >> Cheers, >> >> Peter >> >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 29 May 2008 23:55:54 UTC