- From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 22:05:54 -0400
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: "Peter Ansell" <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, "Nicholas Humfrey" <Nicholas.Humfrey@bbc.co.uk>, public-lod@w3.org
The range is foaf:Document. The domain is owl:Thing.
However, a web page is perfectly fine foaf:Document, different from
the thing that it is about, no I concur with Richard about not
putting a literal - rather:
<the thing>
<foaf:page rdf:resource="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/
b00b07kw.html"></foaf:page>
</the thing>
-Alan
On Jun 21, 2008, at 9:52 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>
> On 21 Jun 2008, at 23:41, Peter Ansell wrote:
>> <foaf:page>http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00b07kw.html</foaf:page>
>>
>> Note that in the above notation the page is an actual URL string and
>> not an RDF resource which is intended because the person already has
>> the semantic resource and just wants to get to the human readable
>> version.
>
> Uh.
>
> Peter, the domain of foaf:page is foaf:Document. You can't put an
> rdfs:Literal there. This is a rather weird suggestion.
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Peter
>>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 22 June 2008 02:10:52 UTC