RE: bbc-programmes.dyndns.org

Your suggested implementation looks excellent, and will work well for us.
I have made some changes to the apache configuration for bbc-programmes.dyndns.org, so it now behaves like this.
Although I still need to sort out the Content-Location and Vary: Accept headers.

The RDF views are not intended to expose exactly the same as the HTML views.
The RDF views and URIs are much closer to how the data is modelled in the database.

I have added a foaf:primaryTopic triple.

Thanks for your feedback :)

nick.

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Cyganiak [mailto:richard@cyganiak.de]
Sent: Sat 6/21/2008 8:27 PM
To: Nicholas Humfrey
Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Subject: Re: bbc-programmes.dyndns.org
 
Nicholas,

I think it would be best to implement the mechanism described here:
http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/#hashuri

This would mean:
<b00b07kw#episode> is the thing
<b00b07kw.rdf> is the RDF variant
<b00b07kw.html> is the HTML variant
<b00b07kw> is a generic, content-negotiated document; it serves the  
right variant directly, without any redirect, and gives the URI of the  
selected variant in the Content-Location header.

It appears that the HTML version provides much more information than  
the very brief RDF version, or am I just not finding most of the RDF?

Other minor things:

<bb0b07kw> should have a "Vary: Accept" header to indicate that the  
resource is subject to content negotiation; otherwise caches can  
become confused

A triple "<bb0b07kw> foaf:primaryTopic <bb0b07kw#episode>" would be  
very helpful for RDF browsers.

Best,
Richard


On 20 Jun 2008, at 15:16, Nicholas Humfrey wrote:

>
> hello,
>
> I am trying to get the work we did on:
> http://bbc-programmes.dyndns.org/
> live on bbc.co.uk.
>
> Does anyone think that there anything that needs changed/fixed  
> before it
> does go live?
>
>
> At the moment we just have RDF/XML views for Brands/Series/Episodes  
> and
> Versions. But plan to is to also have RDF views for for the  
> aggregation
> pages (tags, genres, formats, services, schedules...) some time in the
> future.
>
>
> It seems to be hard to find a consensus on use of URIs, but here is  
> how
> things are the at moment.
>
> HTML Document: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00b07kw
> RDF Document: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00b07kw.rdf
> The thing: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00b07kw#episode
>
>
> When asking for RDF here:
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00b07kw#episode
> you get 303 redirected here:
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00b07kw.rdf
>
>
> Is that sane, or just it infact be a 302?
>
>
> nick.
>
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/
> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain  
> personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless  
> specifically stated.
> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in  
> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
> Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
> Further communication will signify your consent to this.
> 					
>


http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately.
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.