- From: Yves Raimond <yves.raimond@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 16:23:18 +0100
- To: "Kingsley Idehen" <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
> > The same applies for geographic locations, for example. Some datasets > use foaf:based_near to link to Geonames, some others create their own > identifiers, and then link to the corresponding Geonames locations > through owl:sameAs. For the same dataset, this two methodologies will > lead to completely different numbers. > Just a small toy example of that - if I consider the following dataset: @prefix : <http://my-dataset/>. @prefix geo : <http://geographic-dataset/>. :item1 foaf:based_near geo:location1. :item2 foaf:based_near geo:location1. 100% of the dataset correspond to links to another dataset. Now, if I consider :item1 foaf:based_near :location1. :item2 foaf:based_near :location1. :location1 owl:sameAs geo:location1. , which is equivalent to the previous dataset, this number drops to 33% Cheers! y
Received on Saturday, 2 August 2008 15:33:31 UTC