- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 12:40:13 +0100
- To: "Tom Heath" <Tom.Heath@talis.com>
- Cc: "Marc Wick" <marc@geonames.org>, <public-lod@w3.org>
On 10 Apr 2008, at 12:18, Tom Heath wrote: >> A slide deck would be a "Collection", not an "Adaption". >> There is no restriction on how you license your collection, >> only the CC-BY-SA part must remain under that license. > > Thanks for the clarification/pointer; that's really helpful. At the > risk > of being pedantic, one question... What if I layer other elements on > top > of the image, as in slide 18 and later at [1]? Does this now > constitute > a derivative work? I would think yes. > Presumably if so then I simply need to license the > derivative work as CC-BY-SA, but not the Collection as a whole?? That's where things get a bit murky, but I would think that this is a reasonable interpretation: The one slide with the modified diagram is an Adaption, and therefore must be CC-BY-SA licensed. The slide deck is a collection that contains your Adaption as one part, and therefore can be subject to a more restrictive license. > BTW, I note my own ommission of the licensing statement for the > cloud in > that slide set. I'll fix that. This is a very early version, there was no explicit license back then, probably I or Chris sent you the picture directly for use in your slides. Richard > > > Cheers, > > Tom. > > > > [1] http://linkeddata.org/slides/2008-02-amsterdam-catch.pdf
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2008 11:41:07 UTC