- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:50:39 +0100
- To: Mark Diggory <mdiggory@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org
On 4 Apr 2008, at 04:25, Mark Diggory wrote: > Thinking about this further... > >>> /handle/1721.1/36383.rdf serves only RDF/XML. > > and, would the resource in this rdf resolved by tacking on the file > extension contain the same URI as the example above based on the re- > negotiation above? I.E. > >>>>> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://dspace-test.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/36383 >>>>> "> > > > or would it be the location used to resolve the rdf? > >>>>> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://dspace-test.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/36383.rdf >>>>> "> > > I assume it would be the former? Yes, I think that would be best, because if the URI is passed around further, then clients can still get HTML or RDF depending on their preferences. Richard > > > -Mark > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Mark R. Diggory - DSpace Developer and Systems Manager > MIT Libraries, Systems and Technology Services > Massachusetts Institute of Technology > > > > >
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 14:51:22 UTC