- From: Krzysztof Janowicz <janowicz@ucsb.edu>
- Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:34:56 -0700
- To: Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>, <public-locadd@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5421E780.3080109@ucsb.edu>
Hi Frans, > but frankly I did not really get Krzysztof's proposal to use guarded > restrictions to scope the CRS locally. Could someone (Krzysztof?) > elaborate on that? I am sorry for the jargon. I was proposing to locally scope the relations on the level of the Geometry and CRS classes. This is often preferred to global domain and range restrictions. In our current draft, CRS is underspecified anyway, so we do not gain much by introducing the global range restriction anyway. However, we invite unintended consequences that may be more difficult to deal with later. One could easily construct such cases, e.g., by introducing a 'unknown' singleton for unspecified spatial, temporal, and semantic reference systems. Again, this is not a big deal in this particular case but asking the other way around what do we gain from the global range restriction? Best, Krzysztof On 09/16/2014 03:25 AM, Frans Knibbe | Geodan wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I took the liberty of updating the wiki page > <https://www.w3.org/community/locadd/wiki/Proposal_for_extension_of_LOCN_with_properties_for_Coordinate_Reference_System_and_Level_of_Detail>, > an attempt to keep the wiki up with the discussion. I have added a CRS > class. I sense agreement that introducing the CRS class is a step in > the right direction, but frankly I did not really get Krzysztof's > proposal to use guarded restrictions to scope the CRS locally. Could > someone (Krzysztof?) elaborate on that? > > As for the spatial resolution, I am struggling to find a good way to > express this. It seems to me we want to be able to specify a unit and > a value for the spatial resolution. I think it would be nice if we > could also define the spatial resolution to be a distance: a regular > distance (measured in metres, feet, ....) or an angular distance > (measured in degrees, radians,...). I took a brief look at QUDT > (http://qudt.org/), but I have not been able to find an appropriate > distance quantity. So suggestions are very welcome! > > Regards, > Frans > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Frans Knibbe > Geodan > President Kennedylaan 1 > 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) > > T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 > E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl > www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl> | disclaimer > <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Krzysztof Janowicz Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara 4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060 Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/ Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2014 21:35:32 UTC