Re: Trying to use locn:locatorDesignator

Hi Frans,

I've been strugling with the same issue:
http://data.resc.info/bag/page/adres/363200000453365

I did use a double designator, and for the dutch situation I use the 
xsd:decimal as recognition of the first part.
And yes thats a ugly hack, besides that I'm not sure if it is possible to 
have both a house number and a house letter as well.
That wouldn't work in this case.

Any guidance on this one would be nice.

Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
Bart van Leeuwen

##############################################################
# twitter: @semanticfire
# netage.nl
# http://netage.nl
# Enschedepad 76
# 1324 GJ Almere
# The Netherlands
# tel. +31(0)36-5347479
##############################################################



From:   Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
To:     LocAdd W3C CG Public Mailing list <public-locadd@w3.org>
Date:   24-01-2014 16:15
Subject:        Trying  to use locn:locatorDesignator



Hello,

I am working on a case where I need to publish addresses. A fine 
opportunity to use the locn vocabulary! But I think I could use some 
help on the usage of locn:locatorDesignator.

Let's say I have an address "Sesame street 11 B". The locn:thoroughfare 
would then be "Sesame street" and I think "11" and "B" are 
locn:locatorDesignators. Now I could make it easy to say that "11 B" is 
a single locn:locatorDesignator, but the national registry for addresses 
in the Netherlands considers them separate things, a number and an 
extension. So it is desirable to keep them separate. So how do I publish 
the two designators? The order is important, because "Sesame street B 
11" is nonsense.

I believe INSPIRE uses code list to distinguish different kinds of 
locator designators. How can locn handle this case?

Regards,
Frans