RE: Sub-properties for locn:geometry?

Perhaps what is missing at the moment is a sort of primer that describes a
few of these use cases and show how the current locn vocabulary could be
used to model those needs. Beyond the formal definition of the vocabulary
classes and properties in the ontology, I observe that adopters of
vocabulary often like to refer to concrete example and adapt afterwards to
their needs. Should we start to produce concrete examples with the
vocabulary, for example on the wiki? 


+1, absolutely needed. Sven