Re: Whisper from the sidelines...

Hi Phil

thanks for this!
In my case I will provide Spanish translations as well.
Boris

On 02/01/2014 16:34, Kostis Kyzirakos wrote:
> Hi,
> I could also provide with a Greek translation as well.
>
> Cheers,
> Kostis
>
> ===================================================
> Kostis E. Kyzirakos, PhD
> Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica
> DB Architectures (DA)
> Office L320
> Science Park 123
> 1098 XG Amsterdam  (NL)
> tel: +31 (20) 592-4039
> mobile: +31 (0) 6422-95345
> e-mail: kostis@cwi.nl <mailto:kostis@cwi.nl>
> ===================================================
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org 
> <mailto:phila@w3.org>> wrote:
>
>     Pls see inline, Frans.
>
>
>     On 30/12/2013 16:41, Frans Knibbe | Geodan wrote:
>
>         Hello Phil, all
>
>         Thank you for your guidance. I guess point 3 is to ensure
>         backwards
>         compatibility of the vocabulary now that is has been published
>         in W3C
>         space?
>
>
>     Indeed, yes. Furthermore w3.org <http://w3.org> is a highly stable
>     domain with an explicit policy of persistence (with back ups
>     should W3C cease to exist) and so this is all part of it. Once
>     it's in /ns space, you should be able to rely on it indefinitely*.
>
>
>
>
>         Having multilingual labels would be great for this vocabulary. It
>         shouldn't be too hard to add a few languages. I would be happy to
>         provide Dutch labels. What would be the best way to organize
>         this? Using
>         the wiki?
>
>
>     That would be one way, certainly. I'll physically add the labels
>     to the files myself for now but in terms of developing them and,
>     ideally, making sure other NL/EN speakers agree with your
>     translation, that's a good way to go.
>
>
>     Cheers
>
>     Phil
>
>     * Indefinitely meaning some time between the point beyond which no
>     one cares because technology has moved on and the heat death of
>     the universe.
>
>
>
>         Regards,
>         Frans
>
>         On 2013-12-30 11:24, Phil Archer wrote:
>
>             Dear all,
>
>             I am delighted to see so much activity in this CG - it's very
>             encouraging to see such detailed discussion. To encourage its
>             continuation I'd like to highlight a couple of things:
>
>             1. This Community Group may make additions to the locn
>             schema, and add
>             clarifications to the existing term definitions. (NB. we
>             are very keen
>             to see multilingual labels on all schemas in w3.org
>             <http://w3.org> space.)
>
>             2. You have a wiki and the ability to publish documents.
>
>             3. What we won't allow is for any term to be deleted or any
>             substantive change to its semantics. You can, however,
>             deprecate any
>             term.
>
>             4. As I think everyone here is aware, we have a workshop
>             coming up in
>             March [1] which is a joint effort between OGC, W3C,
>             Ordnance Survey,
>             the UK Government (specifically its Linked Data WG chaired
>             by DEFRA's
>             Alex Coley) and Google. We are of course in close contact
>             with Andrea
>             and Michael at the JRC on the event too. The number of
>             expressions of
>             interest I have already received is approaching 50 - this
>             is going to
>             be a big event.
>
>             5. What we don't know is what the outcome of that workshop
>             will be.
>             Indeed, that's the point of workshop - to find out what
>             needs to be
>             done and by whom. An incomplete list of possibilities is:
>
>             - a new, fully chartered working group, able to create W3C
>             Recommendations, potentially joint-branded as OGC standards;
>             - the inverse of that - i.e. an OGC WG whose outputs may
>             end up being
>             jointly branded as W3C (we'll let the lawyers sort that out!);
>             - additional support, i.e. recruits, for this community group;
>             - the formation on a separate CG or a chartered Interest
>             Group (an IG
>             can have staff time allocated, can produce Notes, has
>             access to Zakim
>             etc.)
>
>             Let's use the current energy and the upcoming workshop to
>             continue to
>             build momentum towards better integration of geospatial
>             and linked data.
>
>             Phil.
>
>
>             [1] http://www.w3.org/2014/03/lgd/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>
>
>     Phil Archer
>     W3C Data Activity Lead
>     http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
>
>     http://philarcher.org
>     +44 (0)7887 767755 <tel:%2B44%20%280%297887%20767755>
>     @philarcher1
>
>