Re: GeoSPARQL namespace prefix(es) (was: Re: ISA Core Location Vocabulary)

On 2013-12-30 0:45, Andrea Perego wrote:
> (Original thread: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-locadd/2013Dec/0033.html)
>
> Oscar, Raphaël, thanks again for spotting this.
>
> Actually, the examples were modelled of an earlier version of the 
> GeoSPARQL specification, available in W3C space [1], and they were not 
> updated. I'll take care of revising the LOCN namespace doc accordingly.
>
> However, we still have the problem of the GeoSPARQL prefix to be used 
> instead of "geo" (which in the LOCN namespace doc is already used for 
> the W3C Lat/Long voc).
>
> I would be in favour of using the LOV's one - i.e., "gsp". @Raj, @all, 
> any objections?
No objection, but I use the prefix 'geosparql' myself. That way I 
immediately understand the reference. I think it is still short enough.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Andrea
>
> ----
> [1]http://www.w3.org/2011/02/GeoSPARQL.pdf
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Oscar Corcho <ocorcho@fi.upm.es 
> <mailto:ocorcho@fi.upm.es>> wrote:
>
>     Well spotted, Raphäel,
>
>     In fact, ogc:Point refers really to sf:Point, where sf stands for
>     <http://www.opengis.net/ont/sf#>
>
>     Oscar
>
>
>
>     --
>
>     Oscar Corcho
>     Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
>     Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
>     Facultad de Informática
>     Campus de Montegancedo s/n
>     Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, España
>     Tel. (+34) 91 336 66 05 <tel:%28%2B34%29%2091%20336%2066%2005>
>     Fax (+34) 91 352 48 19 <tel:%28%2B34%29%2091%20352%2048%2019>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     El 28/12/13 13:57, "Raphaël Troncy" <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr
>     <mailto:raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>> escribió:
>
>     >Hello,
>     >
>     >> While reading the description of the vocabulary, I have
>     realized that
>     >> you are not providing the prefix for geosparql (the one that
>     you use in
>     >> ogc:Point, ogc:asWKT, etc). It would be good to add it
>     somewhere in the
>     >> document.
>     >
>     >I agree. I supposed that the ogc prefix refers to
>     ><http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#>. Note that this
>     vocabulary used
>     >instead the 'geo' prefix, although both LOV and prefix.cc prefer to
>     >associate 'geo' with <http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#>. In
>     >prefix.cc, 'ogc' is not associated with any URI while LOV prefers
>     to use
>     >'gsp' to talk about the GeoSPARQL vocabulary.
>     >Question: can we all agree on a convenient prefix name?
>     >
>     >http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql# defines the 'asWKT' datatype
>     >property but I cannot find a definition for 'Point' in this
>     namespace.
>     >What am I missing?
>     >Best regards.
>     >
>     >   Raphaël
>     >
>     >--
>     >Raphaël Troncy
>     >EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech
>     >Multimedia Communications Department
>     >450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
>     >e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr
>     <mailto:raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr> & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
>     <mailto:raphael.troncy@gmail.com>
>     >Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 <tel:%2B33%20%280%294%20-%209300%208242>
>     >Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 <tel:%2B33%20%280%294%20-%209000%208200>
>     >Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
>     <http://www.eurecom.fr/%7Etroncy/>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
> European Commission DG JRC
> Institute for Environment & Sustainability
> Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
> Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
> 21027 Ispra VA, Italy
>
> DE+RD Unit: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/DE
>
> ----
> The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
> not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
> position of the European Commission.


-- 
--------------------------------------
*Geodan*
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl
www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl> | disclaimer 
<http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>
--------------------------------------

Received on Monday, 30 December 2013 11:26:42 UTC