- From: Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 12:26:07 +0100
- To: public-locadd@w3.org
- Message-ID: <52C1584F.3010507@geodan.nl>
On 2013-12-30 0:45, Andrea Perego wrote: > (Original thread: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-locadd/2013Dec/0033.html) > > Oscar, Raphaël, thanks again for spotting this. > > Actually, the examples were modelled of an earlier version of the > GeoSPARQL specification, available in W3C space [1], and they were not > updated. I'll take care of revising the LOCN namespace doc accordingly. > > However, we still have the problem of the GeoSPARQL prefix to be used > instead of "geo" (which in the LOCN namespace doc is already used for > the W3C Lat/Long voc). > > I would be in favour of using the LOV's one - i.e., "gsp". @Raj, @all, > any objections? No objection, but I use the prefix 'geosparql' myself. That way I immediately understand the reference. I think it is still short enough. > > Thanks! > > Andrea > > ---- > [1]http://www.w3.org/2011/02/GeoSPARQL.pdf > > > On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Oscar Corcho <ocorcho@fi.upm.es > <mailto:ocorcho@fi.upm.es>> wrote: > > Well spotted, Raphäel, > > In fact, ogc:Point refers really to sf:Point, where sf stands for > <http://www.opengis.net/ont/sf#> > > Oscar > > > > -- > > Oscar Corcho > Ontology Engineering Group (OEG) > Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial > Facultad de Informática > Campus de Montegancedo s/n > Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, España > Tel. (+34) 91 336 66 05 <tel:%28%2B34%29%2091%20336%2066%2005> > Fax (+34) 91 352 48 19 <tel:%28%2B34%29%2091%20352%2048%2019> > > > > > > > El 28/12/13 13:57, "Raphaël Troncy" <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr > <mailto:raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>> escribió: > > >Hello, > > > >> While reading the description of the vocabulary, I have > realized that > >> you are not providing the prefix for geosparql (the one that > you use in > >> ogc:Point, ogc:asWKT, etc). It would be good to add it > somewhere in the > >> document. > > > >I agree. I supposed that the ogc prefix refers to > ><http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#>. Note that this > vocabulary used > >instead the 'geo' prefix, although both LOV and prefix.cc prefer to > >associate 'geo' with <http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#>. In > >prefix.cc, 'ogc' is not associated with any URI while LOV prefers > to use > >'gsp' to talk about the GeoSPARQL vocabulary. > >Question: can we all agree on a convenient prefix name? > > > >http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql# defines the 'asWKT' datatype > >property but I cannot find a definition for 'Point' in this > namespace. > >What am I missing? > >Best regards. > > > > Raphaël > > > >-- > >Raphaël Troncy > >EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech > >Multimedia Communications Department > >450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. > >e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr > <mailto:raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr> & raphael.troncy@gmail.com > <mailto:raphael.troncy@gmail.com> > >Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 <tel:%2B33%20%280%294%20-%209300%208242> > >Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 <tel:%2B33%20%280%294%20-%209000%208200> > >Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/ > <http://www.eurecom.fr/%7Etroncy/> > > > > > > -- > Andrea Perego, Ph.D. > European Commission DG JRC > Institute for Environment & Sustainability > Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data > Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262 > 21027 Ispra VA, Italy > > DE+RD Unit: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/DE > > ---- > The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may > not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official > position of the European Commission. -- -------------------------------------- *Geodan* President Kennedylaan 1 1079 MB Amsterdam (NL) T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347 E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl www.geodan.nl <http://www.geodan.nl> | disclaimer <http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer> --------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 30 December 2013 11:26:42 UTC