Re: GeoSPARQL namespace prefix(es) (was: Re: ISA Core Location Vocabulary)

Hi Andrea,

No objection to using the prefix in LOV, gsp, for geosparql.

Oscar

-- 

Oscar Corcho
Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
Facultad de Informática
Campus de Montegancedo s/n
Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, España
Tel. (+34) 91 336 66 05
Fax  (+34) 91 352 48 19

De:  Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
Fecha:  lunes, 30 de diciembre de 2013 00:45
Para:  "Oscar Corcho (UPM)" <ocorcho@fi.upm.es>
CC:  Raphael Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, LocAdd W3C CG Public
Mailing list <public-locadd@w3.org>, Michael Lutz
<michael.lutz@jrc.ec.europa.eu>
Asunto:  GeoSPARQL namespace prefix(es) (was: Re: ISA Core Location
Vocabulary)

(Original thread: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-locadd/2013Dec/0033.html)

Oscar, Raphaël, thanks again for spotting this.

Actually, the examples were modelled of an earlier version of the GeoSPARQL
specification, available in W3C space [1], and they were not updated. I'll
take care of revising the LOCN namespace doc accordingly.

However, we still have the problem of the GeoSPARQL prefix to be used
instead of "geo" (which in the LOCN namespace doc is already used for the
W3C Lat/Long voc).

I would be in favour of using the LOV's one - i.e., "gsp". @Raj, @all, any
objections?

Thanks!

Andrea

----
[1]http://www.w3.org/2011/02/GeoSPARQL.pdf


On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Oscar Corcho <ocorcho@fi.upm.es> wrote:
> Well spotted, Raphäel,
> 
> In fact, ogc:Point refers really to sf:Point, where sf stands for
> <http://www.opengis.net/ont/sf#>
> 
> Oscar
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Oscar Corcho
> Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)
> Departamento de Inteligencia Artificial
> Facultad de Informática
> Campus de Montegancedo s/n
> Boadilla del Monte-28660 Madrid, España
> Tel. (+34) 91 336 66 05 <tel:%28%2B34%29%2091%20336%2066%2005>
> Fax  (+34) 91 352 48 19 <tel:%28%2B34%29%2091%20352%2048%2019>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> El 28/12/13 13:57, "Raphaël Troncy" <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr> escribió:
> 
>> >Hello,
>> >
>>> >> While reading the description of the vocabulary, I have realized that
>>> >> you are not providing the prefix for geosparql (the one that you use in
>>> >> ogc:Point, ogc:asWKT, etc). It would be good to add it somewhere in the
>>> >> document.
>> >
>> >I agree. I supposed that the ogc prefix refers to
>> ><http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql#>. Note that this vocabulary used
>> >instead the 'geo' prefix, although both LOV and prefix.cc prefer to
>> >associate 'geo' with <http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#>. In
>> >prefix.cc, 'ogc' is not associated with any URI while LOV prefers to use
>> >'gsp' to talk about the GeoSPARQL vocabulary.
>> >Question: can we all agree on a convenient prefix name?
>> >
>> >http://www.opengis.net/ont/geosparql# defines the 'asWKT' datatype
>> >property but I cannot find a definition for 'Point' in this namespace.
>> >What am I missing?
>> >Best regards.
>> >
>> >   Raphaël
>> >
>> >--
>> >Raphaël Troncy
>> >EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech
>> >Multimedia Communications Department
>> >450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
>> >e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
>> >Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 <tel:%2B33%20%280%294%20-%209300%208242>
>> >Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 <tel:%2B33%20%280%294%20-%209000%208200>
>> >Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
> 
> 



-- 
Andrea Perego, Ph.D.
European Commission DG JRC
Institute for Environment & Sustainability
Unit H06 - Digital Earth & Reference Data
 Via E. Fermi, 2749 - TP 262
21027 Ispra VA, Italy

DE+RD Unit: http://ies.jrc.ec.europa.eu/DE

----
The views expressed are purely those of the writer and may
not in any circumstances be regarded as stating an official
position of the European Commission.