Re: Disjointedness of FRBR classes

Karen Coyle  wrote:

>> That's splitting hairs. The only relevant representation of FRBR in  
>> RDF is http://vocab.org/frbr/ anyway. It was the first, it is  
>> documented best and any average developer will find this namespace,  
>> if looking for FRBR.
>
> The last time I brought this up, Ian Davis replied that his version of
 
> FRBR is not being maintained (there have been changes to the IFLA FRBR
 
> model since then). We should be sure that we are using an up-to-date  
> and maintained implementation of FRBR in RDF. Some could potentially  
> take on responsibility vocab.org/frbr, but I don't know that anyone
has.

It would be enough if Ian handed over edit rights for
http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/ 
to anyone who is willing to maintain an updated version. The current
version
is only hosted a http://vocab.org/. Just create a modified version and
put it at
some web server.

Jakob



-- 
Verbundzentrale des GBV (VZG)
Digitale Bibliothek - Jakob Voß
Platz der Goettinger Sieben 1
37073 Goettingen - Germany
+49 (0)551 39-10242
http://www.gbv.de
jakob.voss@gbv.de

Received on Monday, 31 October 2011 22:46:10 UTC