- From: Richard Light <richard@light.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 18:27:55 +0100
- To: public-lld@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4EA9949B.3010002@light.demon.co.uk>
Jumping in here without much knowledge, so be gentle ... Does the FRBRoo manifestation, based on the CIDOC CRM, offer a less constrained model? I see that an RDF instantiation from last April is available at: http://www.cidoc-crm.org/rdfs/FRBR1.0.1.rdfs Richard On 27/10/2011 13:37, Tom Baker wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 09:39:27PM -0400, Jon Phipps wrote: >> This is basically how I view FRBR. And 'bundles of statements' doesn't >> necessarily translate nicely into entities, classes, or even objects. Without >> those, disjointness doesn't really seem to be much of an issue. > Right - though they would translate nicely into "named graphs", with > significant practical advantages (provenance, exchange, distributed > maintenance...). > >> disjointness doesn't really seem to be much of an issue. > To be clear - you mean that if the bundles of statements are not > entities/classes/objects, it doesn't make sense to say they are disjoint, > right? > > Tom > -- *Richard Light*
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2011 17:28:24 UTC