- From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:01:39 -0500
- To: Jakob Voss <jakob.voss@gbv.de>
- Cc: public-lld@w3.org
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 04:58:57PM +0100, Jakob Voss wrote: > >We probably should - like Karen proposed - establish a community > >group which aligns different approaches into a comprehensive set of > >vocabularies for best practices in describing libraries, their > >services, items, their availability, collections (?) etc. Is there a > >specific procedure for creating such a group? > > One outcome could be an update of the preliminary draft > > http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcmi/collection-application-profile/ > > so the Dublin Core community could be the right place. But what is > wrong with discussing on this list? The recent discussions already > helped me to boil down DAIA and align it with existing ontologies > instead of creating unnecessary new classes and properties. Note that the 2006 UKOLN draft (cited above) was superseded by a 2007 DCMI draft [1]. The DCMI Collection Description Community [2] and application profile task group [3] were deactivated one year ago but could be easily revived if there were interest. Tom [1] http://dublincore.org/groups/collections/collection-application-profile/ [2] http://dublincore.org/groups/collections/ [3] http://dublincore.org/collectionwiki/ -- Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Tuesday, 8 November 2011 18:02:21 UTC