- From: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 13:39:45 -0500
- To: Eric Hellman <eric@hellman.net>
- Cc: public-lld@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 18:40:19 UTC
A page describing a book is a description about a resource. Wow, that felt canonical. It is meaningful to 'like' both the description, and the object being described [1]. As long as there is an IRI which denotes the item being described «frbr & 1:1 principle hand-waving goes here», the facebook liked-data model can distinguish, so you can have two clearly distinguished 'like' buttons (just label them clearly and TEST your UX-Naomi Dushay is not your mother :) Btw: Hellman's law: a little bit of code goes a long way. Spero's corollary to Hellman's law: a large amount of code usually doesn't go anywhere. Simon [1] We've all seen great books get catalog records that were so bad we yearn for the days of card catalogs so we could burn the card and bury the ashes at a crossroads). Especially for databases On Feb 15, 2011 9:01 AM, "Eric Hellman" <eric@hellman.net> wrote:
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 18:40:19 UTC