RE: New BNB sample data available

It would be nice if the constructed heading could have references to the component LCSH concepts. 

It seems unfortunate that skos:OrderedCollection and skos:Concept are disjoint. If they weren't, then the component concepts could be listed in a skos:memberList. Barring that, I could imagine a new SKOS property like this to expression the coordination:

skos:coordinates a owl:ObjectProperty ;
 rdfs:domain skos:Concept ;
 rdfs:range skos:OrderedCollection .

Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-lld-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Antoine Isaac
> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 1:54 PM
> To: open-bibliography@lists.okfn.org; public-lld
> Subject: Re: New BNB sample data available
> 
> Hi Corine,
> 
> [ I'm ccing the library linked data list: this begins to smell like
> real *linked* data that has tricky LD issues ;-)  ]
> 
> It's really great if BNB explicitly includes links to LD sources like
> LCSH!  It deserves feedback indeed...
> 
> The way you make the connection puzzles me a bit, though. Taking the
> following example:
> 
>    <rdf:Description>
>      <dcterms:title>London fragments : a literary
> expedition</dcterms:title>
>      <dcterms:alternative>Londoner Fragmente.
> English</dcterms:alternative>
> [...]
>      <dcterms:subject>
>        <rdf:Description>
>          <skos:inScheme
> rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/authorities#conceptScheme" />
>          <skos:prefLabel>Görner, Rüdiger--Travel--England--
> London.</skos:prefLabel>
>          <rdf:type
> rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept" />
>        </rdf:Description>
>      </dcterms:subject>
>      <dcterms:subject>
>        <rdf:Description
> rdf:about="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh2008107012#concept">
>          <skos:inScheme
> rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/authorities#conceptScheme" />
>          <skos:prefLabel>Literary landmarks--England--
> London.</skos:prefLabel>
>          <rdf:type
> rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#Concept" />
>        </rdf:Description>
>      </dcterms:subject>
> 
> 
> I have tried in the past to exploit the record data and make connection
> between with existing concepts from other sources, and of course there
> are many problems (because of pre-coordination, or just because of
> typos or label changes in the considered KOS).
> So I understand why you define "on-the-fly" (and "in-the-data") the
> concepts that you can't find in the LCSH linked data. And I think this
> is a reasonable solution.
> 
> What puzzles me is the second subject, for which you could recognize an
> existing concept from id.loc.gov. Here you duplicate the data, by
> copying some info you have. I'd have expected
> <dcterms:subject
> rdf:resource="http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh2008107012#concept">
> alone.
> 
> Here you are in effect duplicating data that is served on id.loc.gov.
> Is it to give some minimum data that you want to provide applications
> with, so that they would not have to go and fetch data from id.loc.gov,
> a sort of "data cache"?
> 
> Also, is it generated only from the original book record at BL only? If
> yes, there are two risks:
> 
> - that your data is less complete than the one of other services [1],
> but still it lets your data consumer think that this it is complete. In
> which case, these consumers could decide to have their services not
> follow their nose to the more complete data, which could be harmful to
> everyone.
> 
> - that your data conflicts with the reference one. This is in fact the
> case, as your prefLabel ends with a period ("Literary landmarks--
> England--London.") while the ones at id.loc.gov do not [2]. Ok, here I
> am quite nitpicking, but there could be cases where the mismatch is
> bigger.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Antoine
> 
> [1] e.g., if you don't have skos:broader that id.loc.gov has for LCSH
> concepts, or the xml:lang tag with "en" for your skos:prefLabel
> [2] http://id.loc.gov/authorities/sh2008107012.rdf

> 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:19:41 -0000
> > From: "Deliot, Corine"<Corine.Deliot@bl.uk>
> > Subject: [open-bibliography] New BNB sample data available
> > To:<open-bibliography@lists.okfn.org>
> > Message-ID:
> >  <19BB7EB59CBC594D8DD9F3ACA1EB24A201538E6A@w2k3-bspex2.ad.bl.uk>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > This is to let you know that there are two new sample data files
> > available from our website
> >
> > http://www.bl.uk/bibliographic/datasamples.html

> >
> >
> >
> > The first file is an updated version of the BNB in RDF/XML. The
> > substantive change is that the conversion now carries over the MARC
> > country code for the place of publication.
> >
> >
> >
> > The second file is based on the same conversion but includes links to
> > linked data sources: LCSH in SKOS, MARC country and language codes,
> > Dewey info, Lexvo, GeoNames and the RDF Book Mashup.
> >
> >
> >
> > Feedback welcome.
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> >
> > Corine
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Corine Deliot
> >
> > Metadata Standards Analyst
> >
> > British Library
> >
> > Boston Spa, Wetherby
> >
> > West Yorkshire LS 23 7BQ
> >
>

Received on Thursday, 3 February 2011 20:07:57 UTC