- From: Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 18:15:14 +0200
- To: public-lld@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAODLZ4hyM5JMD8KGzw1U2-WDh7rxJyQv+=fK+=Eo+mjyzwUDvw@mail.gmail.com>
As discussed during our 2011-05-12 telecon [1], where Harry Halpin was invited, the W3C has created a new type of groups, called community groups (CG). CGs are expected to replace the previous incubator (XG) process ; actually, all living incubator groups were invited to transition to Community Groups. The Library Linked Data XG has not transitioned though, mainly for 2 reasons : - the XG was close to its end, even if we asked for a short extension, we still believe our work will be finished by the end of August; - if we were to transition to CG, we feel that it should not be "only" a library CG, but a LAM CG (Libraries, Archives, Museums). This topic was discussed during our 2011-06-30 telecon [2]. The minutes of this teleconference show that there is probably a consensus within the XG that we should transition to CG. While several local groups (like the ALA Linked Data Interest Group) or domain-specific groups (like the IFLA SW Special Interest Group) are being created, there is probably still a need for a more global initiative, and W3C can host such a global, cross-domain group. Moreover, CGs are not bound in time nor in members type (anyone can join) or number. If the LLD XG is to transition to a LAM CG, that raises at least 2 issues : - it would be necessary to draft a new charter (possibly based on or inspired by the LLD XG charter). It wouldn't be just transitionning, rather creating a new group as a result of the work of the XG. - we would need new chair(s). While Antoine, Tom and myself have been very happy to chair the XG, and all 3 of us acknowledge that it a was a great experience and very much appreciate the commitment of the group members, it is not possible for the 3 of us to maintain the level of involvement that is needed to launch a group in the coming weeks. For these reasons, we propose NOT TO transition the XG to community group right now. The creation of a LAM CG would be highly desirable, and we do support the idea. If anyone feels ready to volunteer to drive the creation of such a group, we will also be happy to help him/her/them with the W3C process and contacts. Feedback from anyone on this list is very welcome. Emmanuelle [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/05/12-lld-minutes.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/06/30-lld-minutes.html
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 16:15:52 UTC