- From: Owen Stephens <owen@ostephens.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:17:03 +0100
- To: public-lld <public-lld@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 14:17:32 UTC
Wonder if anyone (Gordon, Karen?) can tell me (and apologies, my knowledge of ISBD is basic/non-existent): Converting MARC records to RDF, and we are looking at putting the statement of responsibility from MARC 245$$c somewhere in the RDF expression to preserve some of the textual description of 'contributor' roles. It looks like the proposed isbd ontlogy may be our best bet for an appropriate property. Is it possible to say that 245$$c would always be expressed as 'hasStatementOfResponsibilityRelatingToTitle' (http://metadataregistry.org/schemaprop/show/id/1948.html), or would it be 'hasStatementOfResponsibilityRelatingToEdition' (http://metadataregistry.org/schemaprop/show/id/1951.html), or would it depend on context etc? Thanks Owen -- Owen Stephens Owen Stephens Consulting Web: http://www.ostephens.com Email: owen@ostephens.com
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 14:17:32 UTC