Re: Draft Relevant Technologies (and vocabularies section)

Nice and concise, Jeff.

I wonder, though, about our focus for this section and for the  
vocabularies section. The latter mixes LLD and BLD (B =  
bibliographic). If we agree that's a good scope then we should bring  
the "B" word into the report early on. I think it would be hard to  
separate library and bibliographic, especially when we are talking  
about linked data where the two will presumably blend together in  
actual use.

The tools here seem to be general SemWeb tools, so to include these in  
our report we need to give a reason why they are here. I don't know of  
any specific LLD tools, does anyone?. (The closest I can think of is  
the Open Metadata Registry, which has an input interface to RDA and  
other library vocabularies, but it also includes non-library  
vocabularies.) We could say that "tools are tools" and we don't  
have/expect LLD-specific tools, or we could say that LLD-specific  
tools will be built on these tools...

kc

Quoting "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>:

> Here's a rough draft of the Relevant Technologies section that I
> promised. It looks like the W3C keeps good lists of tools for several of
> these categories, so I deferred to them whenever possible.
>
>
>
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_Relevant_Technologies
>
>
>
> Comments, suggestions, and elaborations are welcome.
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> ---
>
> Jeffrey A. Young
> Software Architect
> OCLC Research, Mail Code 410
> OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
> 6565 Kilgour Place
> Dublin, OH 43017-3395
> www.oclc.org <http://www.oclc.org>
>
> Voice: 614-764-4342
> Voice: 800-848-5878, ext. 4342
> Fax: 614-718-7477
> Email: jyoung@oclc.org <mailto:jyoung@oclc.org>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet

Received on Sunday, 17 April 2011 17:05:21 UTC