- From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:29:23 -0400
- To: "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: <public-lld@w3.org>
Strictly speaking, library authority data separates personal names and corporate names. Nicolas Bourbaki is an example where the 80/20 rule breaks down in terms of mapping library data to reality. In effect, we can "personify" just about anything if we assign a "personal name" to it. We just need to be aware that people are going to giggle when they realize that "Phil" is our pet rock. ;-) Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: public-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-lld-request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Karen Coyle > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 2:13 PM > To: Dan Brickley > Cc: public-lld@w3.org > Subject: Re: Planned changes to the VIAF RDF > > Quoting Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>: > > My preference now would be to avoid having an explicit > > disjointness statement between Person and Organization in the FOAF > > schema, but I've not tried to persuade any wider community of that > > yet. > > Library authority data does separate persons and corporate bodies, and > also adds another category called "family" (the latter used heavily in > archives when a family is the primary focus of an archival collection, > either as subjects or as creators). > > Note that it does allow these same entities to be change agents > (creators, publishers, whatever) as well as subjects of a resource. > > kc > > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > ph: 1-510-540-7596 > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 18:30:04 UTC