- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:03:30 -0700
- To: Martin Malmsten <Martin.Malmsten@kb.se>
- Cc: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>, public-lld@w3.org
Quoting Martin Malmsten <Martin.Malmsten@kb.se>: > I'm considering/testing $0 in the 1XX fields, analogues to $0 in the > bib record. The idea is that a DbPedia/Freebase/VIAF URI could > authorise an authority record. "Global headings change" becomes a > fun challenge with LD URIs within the record :) I suspect that's the only nearly-standard place to put it. However, it seems to me that an 0xx field would be better since it appears that FRAD considers the 1xx to be a display form for humans. An 0xx might be a better representative of the "real world object" (RWO -- I had to look up that acronym, not having seen it before) that is the focus of the authority record, rather than associating the URI with a form of display. Of course, in theory the authority record's ID is the identifier for the representation of the RWO, although it isn't in URI form. kc > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 1 okt 2010, at 18:00, "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org> wrote: > >> If somebody wanted to put a Linked Data RWO URI in a MARC Authority >> record, where would it plausibly go? >> >> >> >> Jeff >> >> >> >> --- >> >> Jeffrey A. Young >> Software Architect >> OCLC Research, Mail Code 410 >> OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. >> 6565 Kilgour Place >> Dublin, OH 43017-3395 >> www.oclc.org >> >> Voice: 614-764-4342 >> Voice: 800-848-5878, ext. 4342 >> Fax: 614-718-7477 >> Email: jyoung@oclc.org >> >> > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Friday, 1 October 2010 17:04:10 UTC