We intend to use public-xg-lld@w3.org mainly for XG housekeeping stuff, like
teleconference scheduling for instance.
Minutes will be circulated on this list (public-lld@w3.org), and we expect
discussions to happen there too.
We're going to make a clearer explanation about this on the XG's website.
Emmanuelle (on behalf of co-chairs)
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Tom Morris <tfmorris@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Coralie Mercier <coralie@w3.org> wrote:
>
> > You may unsubscribe (and subscribe) to the public-lld@w3.org list
> > Public-lld@w3.org is a public list, just like public-xg-lld@w3.org which
> > now serves for participants of the LLD Incubator Group.
>
> They're not really just like each other since one apparently now has
> restricted membership. Other incubator groups like Provenance and
> Social seem to manage operate successfully without restricting access
> to their "public" lists. Is there a reason that LLD can't do the
> same?
>
> If there are going to be two lists, one public and one restricted, the
> important thing is how the information flow is partitioned between the
> two lists. Which will serve as the primary communications vehicle?
> Will important things like today's minutes get cross-posted to both
> lists or does someone have to write a bot to poll the archives and do
> the cross-posting?
>
> Tom
>
>