- From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 17:53:40 -0400
- To: "Tom Morris" <tfmorris@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, "Jodi Schneider" <jschneider@pobox.com>, "public-lld" <public-lld@w3.org>, "Code for Libraries" <CODE4LIB@listserv.nd.edu>, "Brian Mingus" <Brian.Mingus@colorado.edu>
I suspect this discussion happened on code4lib before the thread got
cross-posting to LLD XG where I first saw it.
There are undoubtedly a ton of diverse use cases, but that doesn't mean
APIs are the best solution. Here are some spitball possibilities for
"not just manifestations" and "we need page numbers".
http://example.org/frbr:serial/2/citation-apa.{bcp-47}.txt
http://example.org/frbr:manifestation/1/citation-apa.{bcp-47}.txt?xyz:st
artPage=5&xyz:endPage=6
I'm imagining an xyz ontology with startPage and endPage, but we can
surely create it if something doesn't already exist.
Jeff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Morris [mailto:tfmorris@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 5:37 PM
> To: Young,Jeff (OR)
> Cc: Karen Coyle; Jodi Schneider; public-lld; Code for Libraries; Brian
> Mingus
> Subject: Re: "universal citation index"
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
> wrote:
> > In terms of Linked Data, it should make sense to treat citations as
> > text/plain variant representations of a FRBR Manifestation.
>
> As Karen mentioned, many types of citation need more information than
> just the manifestation. You also need pages numbers, etc.
>
> Tom
Received on Tuesday, 20 July 2010 21:54:59 UTC