Re: New Use Case Template and Examples

And of course, I forgot the links...

[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Template
[2]
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Authority_Data_Enrichment
[3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Digital_Preservation

Some additional remarks about my wiki changes:

I rearranged the UseCases page a little bit and moved it to Use_Cases:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Cases (UseCases is redirected)

I have copied the contents of Topics3 to Topics and marked Topics3 as
deprecated.

Regards,

Kai


Kai Eckert schrieb:
> Hello all,
> 
> Emmanuelle, Alexander and I finished our work on the redesign of the
> template based on two example use cases. The template [1], as well as
> the two use cases [2,3] can be found in the wiki.
> 
> Beside some minor text clarifications, the main changes are as follows:
> 
>    * Additional section "Application of linked data": We needed this to
> separate the linked data specific content from the actual use case
> scenario. This should encourage contributors to really step back from
> the possible linked data implementation and think independently about
> the actual use case.
> 
>    * We moved the "Existing Work" section upwards, after the
> "Application of Linked Data" section: This should encourage another
> abstraction, we want to separate principle linked data solutions from
> actual solutions that might be used to fulfill the use case.
> 
> In other words: Application of linked data should *not* describe library
> domain specific things. Existing work *should* describe library domain
> specific solutions.
> 
>    * Additional section "Related Vocabularies": Here we just gather
> information about vocabularies, which might be valuable for an overall
> report.
> 
> The "Problems and Limitations" section should then be used to describe
> problems on all levels of the former sections: problems with the whole
> scenario, linked data specific problems, problems with existing works
> and/or vocabularies.
> 
>    * The section "Unanticipated Uses" is extended with "Related Use
> Cases" and can be used to group use cases together, as well as encourage
> new use cases.
> 
>    * The Section "Dimensions" is currently called Dimensions / Topics
> and has been moved to the end of the template: that was already
> suggested on the mailing list. As a preliminary result: The topics have
> to be cleaned up to use them for the use cases, they need at least
> shorter and clearer names and they should not overlap. The dimensions
> were not sufficient for the Digital Preservation use case and should be
> extended.
> 
>    * Additional section "References"
> 
> Regarding the dimensions/topics, we think that we (the XG, not we three
> ;-)) should clean them up a little bit and then refine them later as we
> see the need. At the end of the gathering process, we have to rework the
> topics and dimensions anyway and make sure that they are in line with
> the then-available use cases.
> 
> That's it, now we can continue the discussion about the template.
> 
> Thanks to Emmanuelle and Alexander, the work with you was very
> productive and efficient (and pleasant!). And finally, I consider the
> following actions as DELIVERED, yeah! :-)
> 
> [NEW] ACTION: Alexander, kai, emma to populate the template for use
> cases [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/07/08-lld-minutes.html#action03]
> [NEW] ACTION: stu, alexander, kai and emma to suggest another version of
> the template. [recorded in
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/07/08-lld-minutes.html#action05]
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Kai
> 

-- 
Kai Eckert
Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim
Fachreferat Mathematik, Informatik, Wirtschaftsinformatik
Schloss Ostfluegel
68131 Mannheim
Tel. 0621/181-2946  Fax 0621/181-2918

Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 16:20:36 UTC