- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:21:31 -0800
- To: "Tillett, Barbara" <btil@loc.gov>
- Cc: public-lld <public-lld@w3.org>
Barbara, those are definitely big ones in my mind. I think there are others like the fact that we have a rather hodge-podge of RDF vocabularies that we need to fill out. I think there is a big one lurking, which is the lack of applications for linked data (other than SPARQL, but I see it as an underlying tool rather than an actual application). In any case, these should point the way to future activities that the community should support. kc Quoting "Tillett, Barbara" <btil@loc.gov>: > Aren't some of the big ones centered around the cost of converting > legacy data and developing new systems to follow some as yet > unidentified data structure? - bt > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-lld-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of Karen Coyle > Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 3:42 PM > To: public-lld > Subject: Missing analysis? > > > We don't seem to have identified in our use cases the problems that > people are facing; what is holding them back; what is missing from > the available technology that would make LLD implementable. It seems > that this would be an important section in the report since it is > from these barriers that projects could be incubated. > > kc > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > ph: 1-510-540-7596 > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Wednesday, 22 December 2010 21:22:04 UTC