- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:36:50 -0800
- To: Jakob Voss <jakob.voss@gbv.de>
- Cc: "public-lld@w3.org" <public-lld@w3.org>
Quoting Jakob Voss <jakob.voss@gbv.de>: > I found there are at least four entities to model, but the existing > ontologies are pretty disappointing for library data: > One of the tasks of the working group will be to create a list (soon to be out of date) of existing library-related or library-useful ontologies. At the moment it seems to be hard to discover ontologies, which may be why people tend to get to know one and then use it for almost everything. Some library-specific bibliographic ontologies are: FRBRCore http://vocab.org/frbr/core FRBRer http://iflastandards.info/ns/fr/frbr/frbrer/ ISBD http://iflastandards.info/ns/isbd/elements/ RDA (multiple; linked from http://metadataregistry.org/rdabrowse.htm) kc -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Monday, 13 December 2010 17:37:24 UTC