- From: Ross Singer <ross.singer@talis.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:27:34 -0400
- To: public-lld <public-lld@w3.org>
For LIBRIS, you can take any uri found in the regular search interface: http://libris.kb.se/bib/1204279 and insert "/data" before "/bib" http://libris.kb.se/data/bib/1204279 For the Hungarian National Lib., take their "Cool URI", available on their full record views and change /en (or whatever language string appears there for you): http://nektar.oszk.hu/en/manifestation/11060 to /data : http://nektar.oszk.hu/data/manifestation/11060 -Ross. On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: > Quoting Owen Stephens <owen@ostephens.com>: > > I will start a list of available data sets on the library resources page: > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Library_Data_Resources > >>> Can you point to where their linked data is to be found? It's not >>> obvious >>> from the URLs provided. >>> >>> http://blog.libris.kb.se/semweb/?p=7 gives some detail for libris.kb.se, >> >> and also documented to some extent in this paper >> http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/ojs/pubs/article/viewArticle/927 >> >> The Hungarian National Catalogue has documentation at >> http://nektar.oszk.hu/wiki/Semantic_web > > Unfortunately I'm still not able to find the linked data, most likely > due to lack of language skills. If someone can get urls that produce > actual linked data, I'll add them to the entry on the wiki. > > Also, I should mention here the RDF/XML output from Open Library: > > Author in UI: http://openlibrary.org/authors/OL22022A/Barbara_Cartland > > Author RDF: http://openlibrary.org/authors/OL22022A.rdf > > Work in UI: http://openlibrary.org/works/OL6037025W/Code > > Work in RDF: http://openlibrary.org/works/OL6037025W.rdf > > Edition in UI: http://openlibrary.org/books/OL6807502M/Code > > Edition in RDF: http://openlibrary.org/books/OL6807502M.rdf > > kc > > > >> >> >>> Absolutely: give the world a set of pegs on which to hang their own >>> assertions about bibliographic materials. >>> >>> As you broaden out the audience for this data beyond librarians, most of >>> the data in a MARC record won't be of interest in any case. >>> >>> >>> Agreed that audience for detailed bibliographic information is niche - >> >> although I think it goes beyond librarians >> >> >>> That's one approach: another is to stick with the project of developing a >>> coherent bibliographic ontology, using e.g. FRBRoo to tie in with other >>> areas of cultural heritage. >>> >>> >> I don't see this as necessarily either/or >> >> -- >> Owen Stephens >> Owen Stephens Consulting >> Web: http://www.ostephens.com >> Email: owen@ostephens.com >> > > > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > ph: 1-510-540-7596 > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet > > > > Please consider the environment before printing this email. > > Find out more about Talis at http://www.talis.com/ > shared innovation™ > > Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be those > of Talis Information Ltd or its employees. The content of this email message > and any files that may be attached are confidential, and for the usage of > the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, then > please return this message to the sender and delete it. Any use of this > e-mail by an unauthorised recipient is prohibited. > > Talis Information Ltd is a member of the Talis Group of companies and is > registered in England No 3638278 with its registered office at Knights > Court, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB. >
Received on Friday, 20 August 2010 14:28:02 UTC