W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lld@w3.org > August 2010

Re: Open Library and RDF

From: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:28:34 -0400
To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Cc: public-lld@w3.org
Message-ID: <20100816182834.GB5104@octavius>
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:21:12AM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote:
> >I take the point, yet I would hope the problem could be
> >partitioned to put alot of that detail out of scope for the
> >conversation with the broader community outside libraries.
> >Strings like:
> >
> >    3 transparencies (15 overlays) : b&w ; 26 x 22 cm
> One more thing, sorry. We need a good analysis of the possible uses  
> for the library data beyond being displayed to a human. It turns out  
> that size (e.g. 24 cm) is highly useful to libraries moving items into  
> compact storage units. The number of pages can be the key evidence  
> that two similar editions are or are not actually the same  
> manifestation. And for some specialists, colour can be a factor in  
> determining whether a new work has been produced.

Excellent examples.

> One of my talking points at library meetings is the need to produce  
> more data, less text. In the end, it should be actually *easier* to  
> input, since people are having to key these awkward strings. A set of  
> boxes for H, W, D, and a check for "inch" v "cm" would produce more  
> accurate data, whether or not that data is in RDF. This is a change  
> that needs to take place in any case, but that is not supportable by  

A good idea!


Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Received on Monday, 16 August 2010 18:29:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:57 UTC