- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:30:58 -0700
- To: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Cc: public-lld@w3.org
Quoting Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>: > As I understand it, the FR and RDA approach is indeed to coin > separate properties for each of the WEMI entities, in parallel, > e.g., manifestationTitle, expressionTitle... There are some properties that are aligned with more than one FRBR level, but the majority are not. I would need to look more closely at them, but although they may appear to be the same (usually based on their names) in some cases, in other cases they really are quite different "things." An example is the work title and the manifestation title. The manifestation title is the title actually printed on the item (using books here as the easiest example). The rules for creating a manifestation title are in section 2.3 of RDA. The work title is an artificial construct created by the cataloger to identify the work. It is usually in the original language of the work, and for early works that appeared with numerous different titles it may be hard to determine what best represents the work. The rules for creating the work title are found in section 6.2 of RDA. (*) Note that RDA does NOT have "title" as a property (although it is defined that way in the registry, I don't know why). If you look at the table of elements, you can see that "title" is conceptually a class. There are only specific title types that can be created in RDA. The thing I've called the "manifestation title" is actually either: title proper, parallel title proper, variant title, earlier title proper, later title proper, key title, or abbreviated title. Some of these might not meet the dcterms definition of "a name given to the resource" - for example, earlier and later titles are not names given to the resource but of other versions of the resource (although it all depends on whether you consider a serial that has changed name the same thing or a a new resource.... another lengthy conversation in library-land). OK, I realize that this is pedantic, but I don't know any other way to do this. One thing that might help people who think better with diagrams than text would be to get access to the ERDs that were created in the process of building the RDA online system. They used to be on the online site but are no longer there. I have a few on my hard drive, although they are older versions that are surely not up to date. If anyone has copies that they can post, that would be great, and we can link from the wiki page. kc (*) I make lists and other chart-y things from the RDA registry that help me see the scope of RDA, and I put them on http://kcoyle.net/rda/. I will now try to make a quick pass through for "duplicates" of the type Tom mentions here, and will post them. -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Monday, 16 August 2010 16:31:32 UTC