W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lld@w3.org > August 2010

Re: Open Library and RDF

From: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:21:00 -0400
To: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>
Cc: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, public-lld@w3.org
Message-ID: <20100814202100.GA744@octavius>
Hi Tom,

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 03:40:26PM -0400, Young,Jeff (OR) wrote:
> I didn't mean to imply that Creator *should* be modeled as a class name.
> It's more of a comment about naming properties more carefully to avoid
> this confusion.

Okay, I get it.  Hmm, does that mean you would recommend that
maintainers of new vocabularies _not_ follow DCMI's example
in this regard (e.g., dc:creator)...?  What other examples
would you recommend following instead?

It would be nice if someone could pull together examples
of different naming styles -- e.g., creator, hasCreator,
createdBy -- not just for properties but for classes, with
pointers both to existing RDF vocabularies and guidelines
from traditional standards bodies, taking note of practices
for using singular/plural and the like.  What lessons can
be learned from a decade of practice naming things in RDF


> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 06:02:59PM -0400, Young,Jeff (OR) wrote:
> > IMO, the term "Creator" implies a class name. In contrast, "is the
> > creator of" or "was created by" implies a property. I promise not to
> > whine if "creator" is defined as a property, but only if its range is a
> > class named "Creator". ;-)

Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Received on Saturday, 14 August 2010 20:21:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:18:57 UTC