Joint Breakout meeting at TPAC

Activity has heated up on the CG and WG repositories, and I think it would be worth scheduling a zoom meeting during TPAC. Generally, ideas and proposals are fostered in the CG, which I view the GitHub activity as being the core, and if the WG reaches consensus, I believe there is a route to updating the recommendations with the fruit of that work (Ivan should understand the process required for this). Ivan, perhaps you can also recommend what we may need to do with the TPAC registration form [1], or if this can just be ad-hoc. I suppose if the WG meets, it needs some exposure to give others the opportunity to attend. We also have the proposed joint meeting with the WoT group [2].

Of course, I can’t speak for Benjamin, but at least the CG can meet and we can discuss how to move these initiatives forward.

The following are some issues we might get closure on. I’d suggest we try to work them up to specific proposals so that the WG may have enough information to make resolutions. Based on the WG’s historic ability to get through issues in a meeting, we can clearly only address some of these, unless we have multiple all-day meetings. As usual, please spend time on issues you’re concerned about, and we can add them to the “Discuss-Call” on the JSON-LD Management page [3], at least for those in the WG repositories.

json-ld.org issues:

JSON-LD Query #436 – https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/436
Consider a mechanism for including content from surrounding document #498 – https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/498
Frame Matching & Blank Nodes #579 – https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/579
Consider data transformation in a JSON-LD infrastructure #677 – https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/677
Using framing to differentiate between types in a list. #707 – https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/707
Representing string maps in RDF #709 – https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/709
JSON LD 1.1 prefix handling needs enhancement #714 – https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/714
JSON-LD* thread #727 – https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/727
@id is numeric with @base : not processed by several JSON-LD engines: is it legal? #742 – https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/742

json-ld-syntax issues:

Consider context by reference with metadata #108 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/108
Compact IRI expansion support for non-trivial prefix term definitions #191 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/191
language-maps don't allow separate base direction #280 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/280
@default in @context in JSON-LD core syntax #328 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/328
Suggestion about `@prefix` #329 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/329
Type Coercion / Node Conversion: @coerce keyword or similar #335 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/335
Kill "IRI"? #355 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/355
Support non-propagating proteced terms #361 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/361
New feature: `@template` #362 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/362

json-ld-api issues:

More compact @prefix #76 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/76
Expansion concept "key's term definition" is unclear with compact IRI keys #94 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/94
Recursively nested properties and compaction #391 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/391
relative iri compaction #435 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/435
Lists, sets, and multisets #473 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/473
Is the possibility of having `@id: null` in an expanded document intended?#480 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/480
Rules for dropping free-floating values in Expansion Algorithm #496 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/496
Which context should be used to get the term definition in compaction algorithm step 6? #502 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/502
Default value of produceGeneralizedRdf should be false #503 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/503
integer JSON value should be expanded to an IRI in presence of a base IRI#509 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-api/issues/509

json-ld-framing issues:

Allow class-scoped framing #29 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-framing/issues/29
Several frames in the same frame document? #38 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-framing/issues/38
Reframing Relationships #73 – https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-framing/issues/73


Gregg Kellogg
gregg@greggkellogg.net

[1] https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2020/
[2] https://doodle.com/poll/mqx2wde3a6wth7ib
[3] https://github.com/orgs/w3c/projects/4

Received on Saturday, 26 September 2020 19:08:31 UTC