Re: JSON-LD Framing

On 2/27/19 2:59 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote:
>> On Feb 27, 2019, at 11:56 AM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com
>> <mailto:azaroth42@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ahh! I have been hit by this in the past. If the only distinguishing
>> feature is the type, and then you want to subset that further by
>> requiring additional properties (via require all), then that is not
>> currently possible?
>>
>> Is that a bug that we can fix in 1.1, or a feature?
> 
> It’s not a bug, per-se, as this is how it was designed (clearly, as
> stated by the frame matching algorithm). However, I think we might be
> able to improve this to better align with expectations when both @type
> and properties (and @requireAll) are present. Dave?

Heh, I've been bitten by this myself. I recommend that when
`@requireAll` is `true` and `@type` is present, that we actually require
all of the properties or there is no match. Otherwise `@requireAll`
seems to have no effect in the presence of `@type`.

> 
> Gregg
> 
>> Rob
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:50 AM Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net
>> <mailto:gregg@greggkellogg.net>> wrote:
>>
>>>     On Feb 27, 2019, at 8:07 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
>>>     <soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk
>>>     <mailto:soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     On second thought I think this is a bug in the JSON-LD Playground as
>>>     @requireAll should override that behavior as I described.
>>
>>     It matches the specification text, but there is some room to
>>     modify or improve this.
>>
>>     Currently the Frame Matching Algorithm [1] says the following:
>>
>>         In general, a node object matches a frame if it meets the
>>         matches on |@type|, or |@id|, or if it matches given one of
>>         several different properties (or all properties, if
>>         the require all flag
>>         <https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11-framing/#dfn-require-all-flag> is
>>         present.).
>>
>>
>>     Because `@type` is present, we match using that only. If neither
>>     `@type` nor `@id` are present in the frame, matching is done on
>>     properties. `@requireAll` does, indeed, require that all stated
>>     properties be present to match, which happens if you remove
>>     `@type`. Otherwise, if `@requireAll` is false, it matches on _any_
>>     property present in the frame.
>>
>>     Gregg
>>
>>     [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11-framing/#frame-matching
>>
>>>     On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 15:56:41 +0000, Stian Soiland-Reyes
>>>     <soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk
>>>     <mailto:soiland-reyes@manchester.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>>>     The frames are matched on @type if that is provided, otherwise on
>>>>     pattern.
>>>>
>>>>     If you delete "@type": "Person" it will probably do what you
>>>>     intend at
>>>>     the risk of including other objects that have familyName and
>>>>     givenName.
>>>>
>>>>     On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 11:56:48 +0100, Angelo Veltens
>>>>     <angelo.veltens@online.de <mailto:angelo.veltens@online.de>> wrote:
>>>>>     Hi all, I have a question regarding framing.
>>>>>
>>>>>     I have an input graph containing 2 Persons, and a frame for a
>>>>>     Person
>>>>>     with a specific givenName and familyName. (perma-link below)
>>>>>
>>>>>     My expectation would be, that the result contains only the
>>>>>     Person that
>>>>>     matches the example frame, but in fact, I get both Persons,
>>>>>     just that
>>>>>     the Person, which does not match the frame has givenName and
>>>>>     familyName
>>>>>     set to null.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Am I misunderstanding what framing is supposed to do?
>>>>>
>>>>>     Here is what I am doing  as a perma-link to the playground:
>>>>>
>>>>>     https://json-ld.org/playground/#startTab=tab-framed&json-ld=%7B%22%40context%22%3A%7B%22%40version%22%3A1.1%2C%22%40vocab%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2F%22%7D%2C%22%40graph%22%3A%5B%7B%22%40id%22%3A%221%22%2C%22%40type%22%3A%22Person%22%2C%22name%22%3A%22John%20Doe%22%2C%22givenName%22%3A%22John%22%2C%22familyName%22%3A%22Doe%22%7D%2C%7B%22%40id%22%3A%222%22%2C%22%40type%22%3A%22Person%22%2C%22name%22%3A%22Jane%20Doe%22%2C%22givenName%22%3A%22Jane%22%7D%5D%7D&frame=%7B%22%40context%22%3A%7B%22%40version%22%3A1.1%2C%22%40vocab%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2F%22%7D%2C%22%40type%22%3A%22Person%22%2C%22%40requireAll%22%3Atrue%2C%22givenName%22%3A%22John%22%2C%22familyName%22%3A%22Doe%22%7D&context=%7B%22%40context%22%3A%7B%22%40version%22%3A1.1%2C%22%40vocab%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2F%22%7D%2C%22%40type%22%3A%22Person%22%2C%22%40requireAll%22%3Atrue%2C%22givenName%22%3A%22John%22%2C%22familyName%22%3A%22Doe%22%7D
>>>>>
>>>>>     Thanks in advance!
>>>>>
>>>>>     Kind regards,
>>>>>     Angelo
>>>>>
>>>>     Attachment: pEpkey.asc (application/pgp-keys)
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Rob Sanderson
>> Semantic Architect
>> The Getty Trust
>> Los Angeles, CA 90049
> 


-- 
Dave Longley
CTO
Digital Bazaar, Inc.

Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2019 20:14:01 UTC