Re: Slides for Berlin Data Workshop

good afternoon;

> On 2019-02-27, at 10:19:34, Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr> wrote:
> 
> Sandro,
> 
> 
> In my opinion, this topic should not be debated in the JSON-LD group. It is of course appropriate for the N3 group though.

as this topic an aspect of using json-ld, this group seems a fine place to discuss it.
> 
> Since you ask about graph metadata, I would never use RDF to describe RDF graphs. I would describe the files, or the information resources that encode RDF graphs. These things have a creator, a creation date, access rights, etc. RDF graphs (i.e. sets of RDF triples) are not created. They all are existing in the set of all RDF graphs at the same time.
> 
> In this regard, the interpretation of Carroll et al. is superior: by interpreting the graph name as the named graph pair, you can distinguish the creation dates of two graph-encodings:
> 
> <#mygrah> dc:created "2019-02-26T16:53:42+01:00"^^xsd:dateTime .
> <#yourgrah> dc:created "1999-01-01T00:00:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime .
> <#mygraph> { <timbl> a <Person> }
> <#yourgraph> { <timbl> a <Person> }
> 
> If <#mygraph> and <#yourgraph> are interpreted as the graph "{<timbl> a <Person>}", then this graph has 2 creation dates, which is probably not what you want with your metadata.

how is the not using "RDF to describe RDF graphs”?

best regards, from berlin,
---
james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com