- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 17:14:24 +0000
- To: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
> On 2018-03-31, at 17:00, Sandro Hawke <sandro@hawke.org> wrote: > > > > On March 31, 2018 2:59:15 AM EDT, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote: >> Sandro, I do not have a problem with the quad/named-graph approach at >> all, and JSON-LD is o.k. with it. But the original request was on >> setting attributes to edges, which is a different ballgame… >> > > Forgive my ignorance, but what's the difference between stating an attribute of an edge and a stating a property+value of a single-triple graph? Aren't attributes and properties the same thing? Aren't edges the same as graph arcs, which can be written down as spo triples? > > I can imagine one formal difference which might arise in the case of duplicate or mutable edges, but actually the RDF named graph model handles that in the edge-attribute style (not the mathematical graph style), so again I'm not seeing a difference except that RDF puts the attribute on a set of edges instead of a single edge. If you choose to only use singletons, I think it's the same. > > What am I missing? fernandez, hogan, &co go through the reasons to do this, the various approaches and some notion of the space requirements for wikidata used cases here: http://aidanhogan.com/docs/reification-wikidata-rdf-sparql.pdf --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
Received on Saturday, 31 March 2018 17:14:52 UTC