- From: Benjamin Young <byoung@bigbluehat.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 19:57:42 +0000
- To: Lutz Helm <helm@ub.uni-leipzig.de>, "public-linked-json@w3.org" <public-linked-json@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 17 August 2018 19:58:27 UTC
Hey Lutz, Thanks for raising this question! I'm not sure what informed the original decision, but I do know that the JSON-LD Working Group has begun discussing some variations on the approach: https://github.com/w3c/json-ld-syntax/issues/33 If you have some specific thoughts/concerns/ideas around this topic, we'd love your input! Thanks, Benjamin Co-Chair JSON-LD WG https://www.w3.org/2018/json-ld-wg/ http://json-ld.org/ -- http://bigbluehat.com/ http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung ________________________________ From: Lutz Helm <helm@ub.uni-leipzig.de> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2018 9:52:40 AM To: public-linked-json@w3.org Subject: Why is the value of @version a number? Hi, I just stumbled upon the fact that @version has to be a number in json-ld 1.1 contexts. Is there any reason why this is not a string? I guess it shouldn't ever happen that a spec is released as patch version, and there will probably not be more than eight more versions with nonbreaking changes to the spec, so a decimal number might suffice, but I'm still a little bit puzzled. Best regards, Lutz -- Lutz Helm Bereich Digitale Dienste AG Anwendungsentwicklung Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig Beethovenstraße 6, 04107 Leipzig T: +49 341 97 30566 helm@ub.uni-leipzig.de https://www.ub.uni-leipzig.de/
Received on Friday, 17 August 2018 19:58:27 UTC