Re: Co-Chair

Thanks all! :)    (And happy thanksgiving to US folk)

In order to ensure that we have a good consensus around the 1.1 issues, I
think we should schedule some calls in the new year. The first call or two
could just go over the changes so that everyone is starting from the same
point, and then move on to some of the outstanding questions. Next week,
I'll set up a poll to find a convenient time.

Rob


On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Another belated endorsement from me!
>
> Thanks Gregg and Rob!
>
> Cheers,
> Niklas
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote:
>
>> And a belated endorsement! Welcome Rob :)
>>
>> On 21 November 2017 at 21:05, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you Gregg for taking the initiative here, and everyone else for
>>> your lack of objections :)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not hearing any other proposal or objection, I’ve gone ahead and made
>>>> Rob Co-chair. Welcome, Rob!
>>>>
>>>> Gregg Kellogg
>>>> gregg@greggkellogg.net
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 13, 2017, at 6:32 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Gregg!  If it's acceptable to everyone, I'm very happy to take
>>>> on the work. If anyone else would like to, then please do put yourself
>>>> forwards ... the goal we all share is to move the specifications forwards,
>>>> not to quibble over who sends out agendas for teleconferences :)
>>>>
>>>> My background that Gregg alluded to:
>>>>
>>>> I co-chair the Open Annotation Community Group (currently very quiet,
>>>> following the release of the TRs earlier this year), and co-chaired the Web
>>>> Annotation Working Group, including the negotiations with the W3C about the
>>>> transition of control back and forth. I'm the W3C Advisory Committee
>>>> representative for my organization and have good working relationships with
>>>> many of the W3C staff.
>>>>
>>>> JSON-LD is a core technology choice for the IIIF community [1], for
>>>> which I am on the Executive Board and am the primary editor for the
>>>> Presentation API (which is the main use of JSON-LD).  It is also
>>>> fundamental for ongoing work in the Museum community [2]. This is not just
>>>> another specification and line item on the resumé, a successful
>>>> specification for a new JSON-LD version is a fundamental need for the
>>>> organization and communities that I represent.
>>>>
>>>> Rob
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://github.com/IIIF/api/issues/1192#issuecomment-336225466
>>>> [2] https://linked.art/model/jsonld/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> As we move through spec updates and on to implementations and work for
>>>>> a WG, I think it would be good to have a co-chair. I also think that the
>>>>> time is coming when we want to start CG calls on a regular basis, and the
>>>>> support would be useful.
>>>>>
>>>>> I suggest Rob Sanderson, who has been a CG member for a long time, has
>>>>> volunteered, and has experience chairing W3C Working Groups.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone else that is interested, please put your name forward, and
>>>>> we’ll call for a consensus response to proceed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gregg Kellogg
>>>>> gregg@greggkellogg.net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Rob Sanderson
>>>> Semantic Architect
>>>> The Getty Trust
>>>> Los Angeles, CA 90049
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Rob Sanderson
>>> Semantic Architect
>>> The Getty Trust
>>> Los Angeles, CA 90049
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Rob Sanderson
Semantic Architect
The Getty Trust
Los Angeles, CA 90049