- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 06:23:36 +0000
- To: Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
good morning;
the manifest entry for test 16 notes "Use @type in ducktype filter”, which reads as though clause 2.3 from the framing algorithm is intended.
the but the frame for that test contains
"@type": {},
which corresponds to clause 2.2.
if, on the other hand, the frame omits the type - in order to effect the “ducktype filter”, then the library typed object qualifies, but its untyped constituent does not meet the constraint established by that frame, yet the constituent is present in the test case output.
what is the intent?
best regards, from berlin,
---
james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2016 06:24:07 UTC