Re: JSON-LD & nested structure

@Gregg : I cannot assume that the property will only be used by the
top-level element.

@Dave : already tried it but it doesn't work

On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com>
wrote:

> On 07/29/2016 08:44 AM, Aymeric Brisse wrote:
>
>> Hi Gregg,
>>
>> Thanks for the reply. I played with the JSON-LD Frame feature and it is
>> pretty cool. The problem is that it seems to be a "feature in progress"
>> since it only works on some case:
>>
>> /ISSUE 110/
>> /Currently, framing allows just to select node definitions based on
>> @type matching or duck typing for included properties. It allows value
>> properties to be explicitly matched based on defining the property and
>> excluding things that are undefined, but it does not allow to be more
>> specific about the types of values selected. Allowing this is currently
>> being discussed./
>>
>> (Source: http://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld-framing/)
>>
>> In my case to specify a root entity I would like to be able to specify
>> an @id filter instead of a @type (since my root entity can be linked to
>> other entities of the same type)
>>
>> frame = JSON.parse %({
>>    "@context": {
>>      ....
>>    },
>>    "@id": "http://www.myresource/uuid"
>> })
>>
>> What would you recommend? Adding a fake rdf:type for the JSON-LD
>> serialization and remove it after?
>>
>
> Try out `@id` and see if it works. I think that's been implemented, but
> may be recalling improperly.
>
>
> --
> Dave Longley
> CTO
> Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> http://digitalbazaar.com
>