- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 10:50:26 +0100
- To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net>
- Cc: Nico Schlömer <nico.schloemer@gmail.com>, Linked JSON <public-linked-json@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CABevsUEu1Vv6KaaCpkBoiGnPnjcrj7sDh9=o-aOU5uCceB4iHw@mail.gmail.com>
There's also ORE for the compound objects: http://www.openarchives.org/ore/ And BibFrame for the bibliographic side: http://bibframe.org/ Though it should be noted that BibFrame is undergoing some significant changes at the moment (for the better :) ) and it might be worth waiting until the new version is ready to go before diving in. Rob On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote: > The question of versioning publications in JSON-LD is equivalent to that > for versioning RDF in general. There are a couple of different vocabularies > that might be useful for this: > > PROV - http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/ This is the vocabulary used for the > general RDF Provenance model which includes mechanism to describe versions > (revisions) and related information in something similar to the Git > branching model. > > Bibo - http://bibliontology.com. The Bibo vocabulary is generally used > for describing bibliographic sources and references, including concepts > such as bibo:isVersionOf . > > You might also model different versions using schema.org/PublicationEvent. > CreativeWork -> releasedEvent -> PublicationEvent. > > There’s also a Quora question on this: > https://www.quora.com/Resource-Description-Framework/What-is-the-best-practice-for-versioning-RDF-information > . > > Gregg Kellogg > gregg@greggkellogg.net > > > On Oct 19, 2015, at 9:22 AM, Nico Schlömer <nico.schloemer@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > A scientific article is typically published in several revisions, > > e.g., a bunch of revisions on a preprint server like arXiv [1] plus > > possibly a version somewhere on a publisher's website [2]. The > > versions will generally be perceived as "the same article", but differ > > a little bit here and there. I'd hesitate to refer to them as the same > > document. > > > > Is it possible to express this kind of relationship in JSON-LD? What > > would you recommend? > > > > Cheers, > > Nico > > > > > > [1] http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.2785 > > [2] http://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.012505 > > > > > -- Rob Sanderson Information Standards Advocate Digital Library Systems and Services Stanford, CA 94305
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2015 09:50:58 UTC